|
THE PLACE:
The
neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of an unidentified New
Jersey hospital
THE SENARIO:
A newborn is diagnosed
with a serious gram-negative bacterial infection. Further
investigation reveals that several other infants in the NICU
are colonized with the same organism (meaning the organism
is found in or on the body, but is not causing illness). It
is also found in cultures taken from air vents, sinks, respiratory
and other equipment in the NICU. Clearly, a crisis is at hand.
The situation is far from unique. Hospital-acquired, or nosocomial,
infections are on the rise in hospitals across the country,
both large and small, community-based and urban. Some 5 to
10 percent of patients entering a hospital acquire a drug-resistant
infection they did not have prior to admission. These infections
are increasingly serious: The CDC estimates some 90,000 to
100,000 people die from them each year, and that it costs
$4.6 billion per year to treat them. Nosocomial infections
are now the fourth leading cause of death in the U.S., right
after such other killers as stroke, cancer and heart disease.
Premature, low-birth-weight infants are among the most vulnerable
to such infections, says Peter Wenger, MD, assistant professor
of pediatrics and preventive medicine at UMDNJ-New Jersey
Medical School (NJMS). These babies are at greatest risk for
nosocomial infections due to the immaturity of their immune
defenses. While isolation practices are of great help in controlling
the spread of infection in the NICU, they do not eliminate
the high risk of nosocomial infection in this population.
“Very premature babies have impaired resistance to
infection,” Wenger explains. “Their skin is not
formed, they have already had many interventions, including
endotracheal intubation, urinary tract catheterization, and
intravascular access, and they are often on multiple courses
of antimicrobials.”
Others who are vulnerable include the elderly and those with
compromised immunity and/or chronic illnesses like diabetes
and heart failure. Additional risk factors include gastrointestinal
surgery, organ transplantation, exposure to medical devices,
especially central venous catheters, prolonged hospital stay,
and heavy exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs.
Inter-institutional transfer of patients (say from one hospital
to another, or from hospital to nursing home) also provides
an increased opportunity for the rapid transmission of nosocomial
infections from facility to facility, and in the worst-case
scenario, to
communities at large.
“The hospital patient population has changed over the
years,” says Wenger. “Only the sickest patients
are admitted. Everyone else is treated at home. Those who
are the sickest are more vulnerable to nosocomial infection.”
“There is a sense that these infections may actually
be underreported,” adds Michele Burday, PhD, Director
of the Division of Clinical Microbiology at UMDNJ-University
Hospital (UH). “In community-based hospitals, patients
are in and out so fast that many infections are missed, so
it can be very difficult to track them.”
Antibiotic resistance
It’s estimated that 6 to 8 million antibiotic prescriptions
were written unnecessarily for ear infections last year. By
government estimates, about half of all antibiotic prescriptions
are unwarranted. This overuse has serious repercussions. Eventually,
bacteria “outsmart” the drug and mutate, acquiring
resistance to the antibiotic.
Antibiotic resistance is not just the fault of overprescribing
physicians. These medications are deeply ingrained in agricultural
systems, both plant and animal. “Antibiotics are given
to animals to fatten them up more quickly for the slaughterhouse,”
says Wenger. “They’re in our fruits and vegetables,
since fertilizers are developed from animal stools. They’re
even in our pets: You can buy antibiotics for animals in any
pet store, including tetracycline for fish.” Environmental
bacteria that are exposed to antibiotics may develop resistance,
and pass on that resistance to other bacteria that can infect
humans.
The physician points out that contrary to popular belief,
this is not purely an American phenomenon. Overseas, antibiotics
are available over-the-counter. In some countries, you can
even buy them right on the street. The result of these ubiquitous
antibiotics: a new generation of “superbugs” is
born.
“In many cases, antibiotic resistance is an end result
of advanced medical care,” says Wenger. “The greater
the use of antibiotics, the more likely you are to develop
a resistant strain.”
Barry
Kreiswirth, PhD, is director of the Public Health Research
Institute’s initiative to track and control drug-resistant
hospital infections across the state. Currently some 30 percent
of New Jersey hospitals are participating in the program.
What’s happening in New Jersey
The New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services collects
data from hospitals around the state monitoring nosocomial
infections and publishes a yearly report. The most recent
is the Epidemiology Surveillance System 2001 Report (dated
August 2003; www.state.nj.us/health/cd/episurv2001.pdf).
Eighty-seven unidentified New Jersey hospitals participated
in the survey.
The report identifies three organisms as being the most persistent
and potentially dangerous. They are methicillin-resistant
staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci,
and gram-negative enteric bacilli (which includes Escherichia
coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Acinetobacter
baumannii and others). “Because of their resistance,
these organisms present significant treatment issues,”
says Burday.
Each has unique characteristics. Some are more inherently
resistant than others, including Acinetobacter, which, Burday
observes, seems to be somewhat specific to trauma units, and
Enterococcus, which is not highly pathogenic but nonetheless
is hard to get rid of.
The illnesses they cause vary, depending on what part of
the body is infected. The most serious problems include pneumonia
from infections transmitted by endotracheal intubation, bloodstream
and urinary infections secondary to catheterization, and wound
infections following trauma or surgery. MRSA is most likely
to cause serious skin infections.
“These are not run-of-the-mill infections,” says
Wenger.” “The sickest population gets them.”According
to the report, all three infections increased across the state
from 2000 to 2001, with the largest increase (15.2 percent)
being the gram-negative bacilli. E. coli, Enterobacter spp.
and K. neumoniae accounted for 32 percent of all hospital
acquired infections in 2001. The largest number of overall
cases were MRSA, with a total of 3,903 blood isolates reported
in New Jersey. Mortality rates for MRSA were high: 20 to 40
percent.
The report states: “The epidemiology of MRSA and the
factors driving resistance bear strong similarities to those
occurring with penicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus in
the 1940s and 1950s. Soon after nosocomial penicillin-resistant
S. aureus rates exceeded 40-50 percent, an upswing of community
rates followed. The two rates reached virtually the same level
by the 1970s.”
When all else fails
UH is part of a group of sentinel institutions that collect
and share data on nosocomial infections. The information is
maintained on a national database to which the institutions
have access. Hospital personnel can look at national statistics,
or compare their statistics with other hospitals in their
region. The hospital also publishes an antimicrobic susceptibility
report each year, listing statistics for common and uncommon
infections, as well as their sensitivity to different antibiotics.
While it is meant to be an internal guide to choosing the
appropriate therapies for patients, it also gives insights
into the breakdown of hospital-based infections and effectiveness
of commonly used medications.
“There has been an increase both in number of infections
and resistance,” says Burday. “Right now, some
40 percent of the S. aureus isolates we’re testing are
methicillin resistant. Five years ago, that number was closer
to 25 or 30 percent.”
This particular increase may have serious consequences. In
the case of methicillin-resistant staph infections, there
is only one drug left to treat the infection: vancomycin,
an antibiotic with a significant toxicity profile. Sometimes
referred to as the drug of last resort, it is used against
organisms that are resistant to most other antibiotics.
The problem of “uncontrolled use” of vancomycin
was the subject of much discussion at the International Conference
on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections, held in
December 2003. It was reported that while the use of vancomycin
has increased, several studies described delayed clinical
response or “recalcitrance” in critically ill
patients with MRSA infections.
At UH, protocols are in place to prevent overuse of some
of the more powerful antibiotics. Checklists are used to be
sure the right medications are being prescribed, and certain
drugs cannot be given without the prior approval of an infectious
disease specialist.
Surveillance strategies
While UH has a sophisticated lab capable of performing many
different analyses, most smaller, community-based laboratories
don’t have this capability. Other hospitals that are
part of large health systems may even share laboratory facilities,
leading to delays in recognizing resistant infections and
stopping their spread.
In 2001, the state of New Jersey appropriated $1 million
in funds to the Public Health Research Institute (PHRI), at
the University’s International Center for Public Health
at Science Park, for a program to track and control drug-resistant
hospital infections. The program directors are Barry Kreiswirth,
PhD, and Suzanne Lutwick, RN, MPH, both scientists at PHRI.
Kreiswirth is an expert in DNA fingerprinting and other molecular
typing of infectious organisms, and Lutwick is an infectious
disease epidemiologist.
The two have crisscrossed the state, meeting with NJ hospital
officials to tell them about the program, called the Molecular
Epidemiology Outbreak Center at PHRI. It was stablished as
a support laboratory to genetically characterize both bacterial
and fungal isolates for investigation of suspected cases of
nosocomial transmissions.
“We are working very closely with hospitals to identify
infections,” says Kreiswirth. “One of our strengths
is that we have the tools to track ongoing problems.”
These tools include genotyping isolates with high-tech molecular-based
typing equipment in PHRI labs. Identical isolates from different
patients can suggest that infections are spreading from person
to person within the institution.
When a hospital suspects that there is an outbreak, a designated
staff member can contact PHRI to discuss the problem. A primary
specimen (usually either blood or sputum) is sent over to
the Molecular Epidemiology Outbreak Center, where scientists
will identify the organism and which antibiotics it will respond
to. Suggested ‘next steps’ are discussed with
hospital contacts.
For example, when the hospital with the outbreak in the NICU
realized they had a problem, they sent isolates from all four
patients to PHRI to determine if they shared the same DNA
fingerprint. Testingconfirmed that the strains were genetically
related to each other. By pinpointing the source of infections,
interventions can be focused in a particular place. “You
can’t eliminate hospital-based infections entirely,”
says Kreiswirth.” But if two people in an ICU have staph
infections, our goal is to prevent the patients around them
from getting it too.”
One-third of the more than 80 hospitals in the state are
currently participating in the program. “We take a strong
stance on confidentiality,” says Lutwick. “We
maintain our data without using names, so no person or institution
is exposed.”
Prevention is Key
Experts estimate that one-third of nosocomial infections
can be prevented, and billions of dollars saved, if good infection
control practices are put in place. These include: improved
surveillance of resistant organisms; judicious use and surveillance
of antimicrobials; strict adherence to infection control procedures,
including CDC guidelines for hospital hygiene; careful monitoring
of IV lines, feeding tubes, and other interventions; isolation
of patients with infections; and even the use of novel new
infection-fighting vaccines.
“There is a vaccine for strep pneumonia, a common infection,
and it could be offered hand-in-hand with the flu vaccine
to those at risk,” says Beverlyann Collins, RN, MS,
CIC, director of infection control at UH. “Unfortunately,
many HMOs will not pay for it.” The Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS), a Federal agency within the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, recently removed
restrictions on how the vaccine is administered and reimburses
for it, and it is hoped that HMOs will follow suit.
While hand washing is the single most effective means of
reducing hospital-based infections, numerous studies have
demonstrated very low rates of compliance among healthcare
workers. Says Collins: “Research indicates that only
about 40 percent of healthcare workers wash their hands between
patient visits, even when they know they are being observed.”
The CDC recently issued new guidelines for hand hygiene as
a means of reducing infections in hospitals. This includes
the use of alcohol-based cleaners, which are more effective
than soap and water. While the CDC is not a regulatory agency,
and has no authority to enforce the guidelines, The Joint
Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO),
the accrediting body for healthcare institutions, has come
out strongly in favor of them, and has great influence in
getting compliance from healthcare institutions.
Alcohol-based cleaners are being used in many hospitals,
including UH, where they were implemented in 2002. Dispensers
containing an alcohol-based antiseptic hand-washing gel are
in each patient’s room. Nurses, physicians, technicians
and anyone else who enters are directed to clean their hands
before and after touching the patient or
anything in the room. The gel is rubbed on the hands; no water
is needed and it does not dry out the skin. “Hand hygiene
compliance is up, and this has had a positive effect on curtailing
infections,” Collins states.
JCAHO has taken other initiatives in the battle against nosocomial
infections, now directing hospitals to track and report death
or significant harm to patients caused by hospital-acquired
infections. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
are also looking more closely at nosocomial infections. Both
agencies are considering publishing specific data on hospital
infections, including the institutions’ names, and making
it available to the public. Collins adds that the information
may become public by the end of 2004 or early 2005.
While infection prevention initiatives like hand washing
may seem simplistic, they do work. The hospital with the outbreak
in the NICU was advised to initiate the following interventions:
add more hand washing stations, monitor staff to be sure they
were practicing proper hand washing hygiene, and step up aggressive
cleaning procedures, including more frequent decontamination
of common use equipment. Within two weeks, the interventions
were effective in stopping the spread of the bacterial cluster.
“But the bottom line is, antibiotics need to be used
judiciously to preserve their effectiveness,” says Wenger.
“As we’ve seen only too well throughout history,
any antibiotic will eventually lose its effectiveness if it’s
overused.”
|